Jump to content

User talk:Tvpuppy

Add topic
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Latest comment: 16 days ago by Ooligan in topic question.
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Tvpuppy!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 06:14, 9 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Jitra?

[edit]

Why do you claim it's made at Jitra if coordinates you provided it ostensibly made at is no more then address from the advertisement (telling where exactly that company office had place), but according to much later google street view there's no any 3-storey buildings nearby there address (I "searched" whole the area)... Ohhoho ))) How did you found that exact 3 storey building??? )) Are you familiar with that city or place? How?? used some AI? Or knew where exactly SSW was formerly located? ) 201.150.118.26 09:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

No, I just searched using Google Map, just like you mentioned above. The initial search for the address didn’t bring me to the correct location, but I felt it brought me to the general area. Then, I just searched for “tyres shops” near the area and used Streetview to pinpoint the exact building. Tvpuppy (talk) 12:12, 1 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Ahhahah ) so simple ) Thank you ) I have to use your way next time.
I used much harder way to find it but failed.
First I tried to street map it going through the road (but not searching anything more), then I decided it's some official SSW retailer and finalized on that page where I look into Kedah affiliate that is at totally different 2-story building and mixed it (current picture) up with Selangor retailer's 3-story building, but after streetmapping it finally gave up.
It looks like sometimes simple way is the best ) Thank you. 201.150.118.26 14:56, 1 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

A Barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Editor's Barnstar
I am amazed by the soundness of your information provisioning. Grand-Duc (talk) 00:37, 12 May 2025 (UTC)Reply


I feel like Special:Diff/1030861536/1030956646 is really valuable in its current topic. Thank you! :-) Grand-Duc (talk) 00:37, 12 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the barnstar! Tvpuppy (talk) 00:51, 12 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

License reviewer

[edit]

Hello Tvpuppy, Have you considered going for license reviewer? You have the skills, and we can always use the help! All the Best -- Chuck Talk 04:27, 14 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello @Alachuckthebuck, thank you for the offer and recognition. Actually I started considering and looking into it two months ago when Grand-Duc also offered me to go for license review. Currently, I still wanted to gain a bit more experience before putting in the request, but I feel I’m getting closer to being ready each day. I think in around 1-2 months, I will be ready to go for it. Thank you for asking. Tvpuppy (talk) 05:27, 14 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Deletion request, helpful comment

[edit]

Hello Tvpuppy,

wanna try your hand at closing Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wikimedia Summit 2022 K1.jpg? Non-admins are also entitled to close discussions when keeping the file is the single sensible outcome: Commons:Deletion requests#Closing discussions. Here, the rationale "copyvio-derivative" disappeared because you managed to spot the underlying work. Nobody should object, as we're both the actual nominators for deletion (my speedy, your standard DR). Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 14:28, 31 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Sure, I will try it out. Thanks for letting me know. Tvpuppy (talk) 15:39, 31 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Deletion request, language help?

[edit]

Hello Tvpuppy, I communicated with a fellow Wikimedian in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ch2ems, me using English and Google Translate, and him using simplified Chinese. Do you eventually have the time to check whether the machine translation removes finer parts of relevant expressions? The gist I've gotten is that he's engaged with local sport associations, is photographing and providing media for these clubs (in parallel to Commons) and maybe his social media presence, uses several (also high levelled) cameras and has a bit of struggling with cloud storage services. Do you think that my points of providing sufficient creation history and preferentially EXIF got through? Just asking, as relying on machine translators has its negative points... Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 00:12, 4 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Grand-Duc For the point about creation history, I checked the Google translation and it is a bit confusing so I translated your point to them again. For the point about the EXIF, I think they did understand since they explained why the photos didn’t have EXIF, and they said they will pay more attention when uploading in the future.
Also, I think you got the gist but just in case the translation didn’t make sense, their explanation was that they posted the photos on social media and also backed up their photos on the cloud storage. However, they were using the free version of the cloud storage, so the download speed was very slow. That’s why it’s more convenient for them to just download it from their social media, hence the lack of EXIF. Tvpuppy (talk) 02:18, 4 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations, dear license reviewer

[edit]
If you use the helper gadget, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-.

Hi Tvpuppy, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review and files from other sources. You can enable the LicenseReview gadget from Preferences.

Important: You should not review your own uploads, nor those of anyone closely related to you!

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons webchat on irc.libera.chat. You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! --C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 02:32, 11 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, thanks for the message as well. Tvpuppy (talk) 02:38, 11 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi Tvpuppy,

Hope you're fine. At the end of this deletion request talk, please note other files to add (which I could find). Thank's. Tisourcier (talk) 17:49, 16 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Tisourcier Thank you for letting me know. I moved the list of images in your latest comment to my comment at the top, so now it should look more organized. Tvpuppy (talk) 18:09, 16 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Best regards and thank's again for all your work here. ;) Tisourcier (talk) 16:31, 17 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hello again,
We could add also this file too :
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Logo_%2BSport.png
And categories (?) as such as : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Canal%2B_France_logos
Regards. Tisourcier (talk) 18:11, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hello @Tisourcier, in my opinion, I think it is better to wait for the final decision to be made first for the logos that are currently nominated. If it was decided to delete them, then I (or others) will surely nominate the remaining logos in Category:Canal+ France logos accordingly. Currently, unless it will help support the deletion request, I don’t think adding more logos will contribute to it.
Still, if you want to add a comment with a list of images to the deletion request like before, I have no problem helping to organize it. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 19:48, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hi ! I understand. It's a decent way to proceed. Thank's to you. Now the main point is precautionary principle deletion apply. Have a nice day. ;) Tisourcier (talk) 13:03, 1 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Provinces of Cambodia

[edit]

Hi senior, Thank for creating Template:Administrative divisions of Myanmar.

Plz make another Template on

English Wikipedia page :- Provinces of Cambodia.

Thank u😊 獅眠洞 (talk) 15:58, 24 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello @獅眠洞, I created {{Provinces of Cambodia}}, you can see its example usage at Category:Maps of Battambang Province. Tvpuppy (talk) 19:57, 24 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank u senior. 獅眠洞 (talk) 20:20, 24 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Claims

[edit]

You know, I put in a lot of effort, you know, I did a lot of things, you can upload your photos that you want, I'm very interested to see how you cope with this. Spectra321578 (talk) 20:47, 27 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello @Spectra321578. Sorry but I’m quite confused. I’m not sure I understand what you are talking about. Do you have a question or need help from me? Tvpuppy (talk) 20:54, 27 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
There are complaints!
What the hell did you do to touch my work? A month ago you said they needed to be deleted.
I think this is unfair, because I tried, worked, tried to do everything carefully so that there would be no complaints, and now my work is being removed under the stigma.
Stop this circus, the guy uploaded his edits and you don't care, you just want to show off in front of the administration.
Stoop! What's wrong with you today? Spectra321578 (talk) 21:18, 27 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for reminding me. I understand you are frustrated that your uploads are being nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:Spectra321578. However, I have a couple points for you:
  • First, this issue should be discussed at the deletion request page, having the discussion here in my talk page does not do anything to help. This is because it is the admins who decide whether to keep or delete images, and they most likely will not be able to see any discussions in talk pages.
  • Second, your images were nominated on the basis that they are out-of-scope. If you think they are not out-of-scope, please provide an explanation about the images themselves, unfortunately the argument that you “put a lot of effort” is not a sufficient reason for an image to be kept.
  • Third, in the comment above, you told me to “stop” two times, but I’m not sure what do you want me to “stop”, since I have only commented once on a deletion request page a month ago. You also said “the guy uploaded his edits and you don't care”, but I don’t know who you were referring to.
  • Fourth, I noticed you “thanked” me twice just now, but from your comment above, I don’t think you are truly “thanking” me. It seems to me you may have used the “thank” button as an attempt of harassment, so I will remind you to stop doing that.
  • Finally, as mentioned above, if you want to provide more explanation, please do it at the deletion request page. I do not need you or expect you to reply to this comment. Thank you.
Tvpuppy (talk) 21:57, 27 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Article check on ZH-WP

[edit]

Hello Tvpuppy, can I ask you to lend me a hand?

I took charge of this request here: Commons:Village pump#Aloe suzannae; the plant happens to have articles in Chinese Wikipedia editions, see the Interwikis in de:Aloestrela suzannae (sorry for German, EN doesn't actually have a species article, only for the genus) or on d:Q135695.

Could you look whether the rename is already reflected there? Thanks ans sorry for the bother. :-) Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 22:22, 11 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello @Grand-Duc, I think the plant name on zh-wiki article will remain the same for now, as there isn’t a Chinese name for the genus “Aloestrela” (other than the Chinese name for “Aloe”). Still, I will change the references to its Latin name so it reflects the change as mentioned. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 22:55, 11 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

question.

[edit]

Hello Tvpuppy,

In the edit summary you wrote, "Add note by Jmabel" here: [1]. Could you please share a link to this note? Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 05:55, 14 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello @Ooligan, it was from a Village Pump discussion, here: Commons:Village pump/Archive/2025/07#Category:Files from 500px.com with bad file names. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 12:18, 14 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for this link. -- Ooligan (talk) 00:24, 15 July 2025 (UTC)Reply